Home Page | Site Map | Civil Service Directory Page | Salary Commission
MEMORANDUM
| TO: | J. William Sanborn, Chair Salary Commission |
| FROM: | Glenn Hara, Chair Tier Review Committee |
| DATE: | October 6, 2003 |
| SUBJECT: | Final Report on Study of a Tiered Compensation System |
The Tier Review Committee (TRC), consisting of Mr. Glenn Hara, Chair; Mr. Paul Mann, Vice Chair; Mr. Joe Tanaka, and Mr. Gerald Kita, was established by the Salary Commission at its meeting of July 7, 2003 to study salary tiering for departments and agencies.
Criteria
The TRC decided to adopt the criteria for evaluating the various departments established in 1991 by a prior commission. Its first step was to ask the departments/agencies for comments and recommendations on the established criteria (see Attachment 1) to assist the TRC in evaluating the criteria for relevancy and appropriateness. A minor addition was made to criteria #5, whereby departments/agencies were asked to indicate whether their salary inversion problem was significant, serious, or a potential one.
To assist in rating this particular criteria on salary inversion, the TRC requested updated information on departments with EMs making more than the department head, to include a projection of others moving up, and listing the top EM positions by department (Attachment 2). Subsequently, the TRC concluded that it would disregard this criteria initially, noting that inversion, in the final analysis, would either exist or not exist in a department and the matter would be taken into consideration at a later point in the review if a department/agency in fact had an inversion problem.
Tier Rating Worksheet
Departments and agencies were subsequently asked to rank themselves, following the criteria, on a tier rating worksheet using a scale of 1-3 (1=below average, 2=average, 3=above average). The TRC then plotted its own ranking on the worksheet, comparing it with the prior commissions ranking. A tier rating worksheet showing the TRCs preliminary ranking is enclosed for your review (Attachment 3).
The Mayor was asked to do an overall evaluation (ranking) of the department and agency heads on the worksheet. To date, the TRC has not received the completed worksheet; however, it will be forwarded to the Commission upon receipt.
Tiers
The TRC tentatively determined that there will be four tiers:
Tier 1 Mayor
Tier 2 Managing Director, Prosecuting Attorney
Tier 3 Departments/agencies (see below for list)
Tier 4 Departments/agencies (see below for list)
The TRCs assumption is that deputies will receive a salary 5% below the department head, and, therefore, deputies were not ranked on the rating worksheet.
Upon acceptance of the recommendations in this report, it is envisioned that the full Commission will invite each department and agency head to appear before the Commission to comment on the TRCs report and recommendations.
Establishment of Committee to Study Council Salaries
The TRC recognizes that the Council adheres to different criteria from the department/agency heads. In view of this, and to expedite the process, the TRC recommends that the Chair establish a second committee to study Council salaries.
Recommendations
- The department/agencies be assigned to tiers indicated below.
Tier 3 Corporation Counsel Civil Service Environmental Management Finance Fire Housing Planning Police Public Works Tier 4 Data Systems Liquor Parks & Recreation Research & Development Mass Transit Legislative Auditor County Clerk
- The tiers be allocated to the pay grades indicated below:
Tier 1 - A-20
Tier 2 - A-19
Tier 3 - A-18 (Deputies at A-17)
Tier 4 A-17 (Deputies at A-16)The TRC also recommends that department heads and deputies start at step A, except for Police and Fire, who are currently at A-18(C), and Public Works, who, because of the existing inversion problem, should also start at step C.
- That the Commission adopt the pay schedule at Attachment 4.
Home Page | Site Map | Civil Service Directory Page | Salary Commission
©Copyright 2003 County of Hawaii, Hawaii